|
Red River County Just-Us by Varley found Real Justice in
Collin County Courthouse and was DE-GUTTED!
Friday January 16, 2009
Refined further Sunday
January 17, 2009
RR Just-Us (Prosecution)
For the last several days (Wed. 15th, Thur.
16th,
Fri. 17th of Jan 2009), I had the honor, and privilege of attending
and supporting Mark, Rhonda, and Robert and their proven and
undisputable innocence clearly shown during their Aggravated Sexual Assault
trial in Collin County. This malicious, unfounded
prosecution was brought about by our Corrupt and Criminally
Motivated County Attorney Val Varley using purgered
testimony most likely formulated by he, Jerry Coyle and the
main prosecution witness Shannon Coyle.
I was not allowed to
attend the first day of trial (because of my witness status)
in which Shannon Coyle (wife of Jerry Coyle) took the stand
and admitted that she "LIED UNDER OATH" to the two Red River
County Grand Jury's numerous times, allowing Varley to get indictments against the
defendants. She was also caught more than 40 times lying under oath to the Collin County Jury as the
Leshers' and McCarvers' attorney's cross-examined her.
This was absolutely no trip up of her
telling the truth about the accusations she purported, but a
trip up of Shannon Coyle to keep all the lies straight that
she continues to tell. This preposterous attempt to
convict the defendants using their (Varley, Shannon, Jerry)
concocted lies would have been seen by ANY honest
prosecutor, and he would have stopped the trial, and
moved to drop the charges against the defendants immediately
with prejudice. Not our illustrious, un-stained,
un-sullied County attorney. He continued to support
those lies continuing to use every possible means to make
them stronger in an attempt to achieve conviction.
Shannon Coyle had, and and continues to lie so many
times, and has told so many different lies that she can not
keep them straight. My understanding of the
first day's testimony, was that she could not answer the
same question the same way twice.
The transcripts will show that on cross,
Shannon admitted to the jury that she considered herself to
be a cold-hearted bitch, and that she had a full color
tattoo of the devil with a pitchfork directly over her
heart.
The defense during the cross, played the recording of a call that
Mrs. Coyle left
on an answering machine of a relative that spewed vulgarity
after vulgarity that "She was doing
all she could to play the game to get her daughter, son, and
her away from
her perverted f'ing husband, (Jerry Coyle) using explicative's
such as that Perverted M&^HER
F*^#ER! She told the relative to back off, so she could get herself and the
kids away from Coyle.
Shannon Coyle testified that the Defendants
held her captive at the Mill Creek Ranch, home of Mark
and Rhonda Lesher. Coyle made reference to the locked
gates that she stated prevented her from leaving. The
Defense team produced pictures of the
automatic gates to the entrance of the property which
clearly showed that she could easily get out by going
through openings in the fence to the left and right of the rock walls
supporting the
gates. There was absolutely no evidence that she could have been held by locking
the gates. Varley continued to support his purgered
witness by doing everything possible to show a person
could not get around those automatic gates, but
everyone could
clearly see that he was exaggerating the situation.
His attempt to fool the jury into believing that what
they were clearly seeing with their eyes was not what
they were actually seeing, but the pictures presented on a
full size projection screen made it impossible for him
to do so.
I do not understand how
Varley felt he could continue to attempt to mislead the jury
when he could easily see that Coyle or anyone else for that
matter could easily exit on foot. He even accused the
Lesher's of changing the gates from what they were
originally. I know for a fact that those gates
are the same as they have been since I have known Mark
and Rhonda.
Jerry Coyle was not allowed into the courtroom because he was on the State's
witness list and could not be present, due to the rule being
invoked. He was never allowed to testify in the case
(which was probably a blessing to the Prosecution even
though he was on their witness list). I am sure the defense
most definitely wanted to get Jerry Coyle on the stand under
cross examination so they could gut him and then hand him a
pitchfork to put them back in.
Varley got up the next day (Tuesday
when I was allowed in after the testimony of Coyle had
nearly ended and before he called his next witness) in front of the Jury, the Court, and
a room full of spectators and admitted that the Cross
Examination of Shannon Coyle by the defense was the "Best
DE-Gutting" of a Prosecution Witness" he had seen.
What Varley was too stupid and
ignorant to understand was that he and his case had been
de-gutted, yet he continued to pursue the unfounded
conviction of all defendants.
The testimony of Shannon's son who is at
the present
12yrs. old, (10 at the time) could be noted that he loved
his mother and wanted to protect her at all costs, which
included lying under oath if needed. (After
he testified under oath, we had witnesses that saw him and
Shannon Coyle do a high-five in the hallway.) Any
honest person could see that his testimony
seemed programmed, and most definitely rehearsed as he denied,
time and time again that he had not spoken
to anyone about the sexual abuse of his, at the time 12yr. old
sister, and his sexual abuse by perverted Jerry Coyle (who
Jerry supported, and watched with him as they peeked through
the cracked bedroom door viewing his 12yr. old sister and
her 16 yr. old boyfriend having sexual intercourse).
He previously had stated in front of
witnesses that the boyfriend was allowed to live at the
Coyle's residence, and to sleep in the daughter's bedroom in
her bed more than once as had Shannon. The
answers he gave to questions on direct and cross were mainly
yes and no answers which seemed even more programmed.
He also stated that
he did not like the first counselor because she had called
him a liar, which in later testimony of the defense by the
first counselor (who was very credible, and professional)
stated that she never called the boy a liar.
When asked by Varley what he thought about Robert (Red)
McCarver he stated in front of the entire courtroom that "He
Is a Piece of Shit!" which seemed to catch Varley
off guard, and he asked "What?" and the boy again
stated "He
Is a Piece of Shit!" The Judge admonished him to refrain from using anything other than proper
language in his court.
The programmed part of his
testimony came from the fact that he has a lot of material things at
home that only Jerry Coyle's money could provide, like dirt bikes,
vehicles, etc. As
a boy he does not want to lose those things, and it seems
that he can be (as all young children can be) programmed to
say what someone wants in order to keep those material
things that he likes.
The
first counselor, hired by the amicus (the attorney
appointed by the court to represent the children) was
allowed to be fired by Jerry Coyle by the court because he did not like
the questions she was asking the children about sexual
abuse which they and Shannon out cried to the first
appointed counselor, and a second counselor was hired in
which Jerry Coyle approved. I was in the office when Shannon, her
son and Robert (Red) Lynn McCarver came in to sign
the complaint on then Judge Jim Dick Lovett (the complaint
solicited by, and filed at her request) was drawn up by Mark
Lesher for her to sign. Shannon requested that
he draw up the complaint which was in no way a conflict of
interest. This complaint will be
discussed later in the series, and explanations along with a
link to that complaint will be provided at a later date.
During this visit,
Shannon's son talked with Red and I could tell that he
really liked Red because he took him fishing, and I could
tell that he loved to fish. The two of them even
talked about going fishing together after they left the
office that day. Robert (Red) treated him really well from
what I could tell because he liked the boy, and wanted
to share experiences that he liked to do as a boy with him,
and everyone knows that Red loves to fish.
Out cries were made at
this time without any coercion or intimidation by Mark or
Rhonda about the sexual abuse of the daughter and sister by
Shannon and the boy to Mark and Rhonda. I heard bits
and pieces of their allegations as I worked on the computers
around the office that day.
The allegations of what was being done by Jerry Coyle would
make any credible, honest Christian person feel an urgent
necessity to do anything and everything legal and proper to
to alleviate this perverted sexual situation.
The second
Counselor to the Coyle Children, parent Shannon, and Step
father Jerry Coyle, who testified for the prosecution, admitted
on cross that she did not bother to ask
questions of the first counselor and her findings, or about the
outcries by Shannon Coyle or the children. She
admitted that she had
done NO investigation into the sexual abuse allegations
that were brought out in testimony in open court during the
first child custody hearing. She also admitted that
she did not bother to investigate by asking questions of law
enforcement, nor had she bothered to even read court
testimony of the first hearing where the allegations of sexual
abuse of the then 12 yr. old daughter by Step Father Jerry
Coyle were made by his wife Shannon, and her son.
She clearly stated that she did not believe in asking questions that
delved into explicit aspects of sexual abuse, or had any problems
in believing her clients unless she caught them in a direct lie.
(Don't ask, and you won't be told.)
If I had been a juror,
even though I am not totally un-biased, I would have
wondered about her testimony, and why she did nothing but
what seemed to be the will of Jerry Coyle, and his money.
You could tell that she was very young, and did not have
years of experience and professionalism of the first
counselor. She was an innocent flighty little thing
that probably gave Varley a little extra exhilaration just
looking at her. (We all know of his interest in the ladies,
and his alleged interest even in some of the gentleman.
Aren't you a little AC - DC Valerie?
My thoughts on the
subject, as well as I would bet the thoughts of some of the
Jurors, and possibly you as the reader is, why in the world she
did not investigate what
the Attorney appointed for the children had asked her to do.
I suppose the fact that she was appointed by Judge Banner
from Greenville (hearing the child custody case) at the
protest of Jerry Coyle of the first counselor, had
nothing to do with it.
My question to
Judge banner would be
"Why did you ignore
the testimony of the first counselor, and allow Jerry Coyle
to fire the first counselor who was doing a honest, and
professional service to the court, only to hire a second counselor who did absolutely
nothing?"
My curiosity is peaked, knowing
the reputation of the Just-Us system of
Red
River
County (which has the shady reputation of being able to be
purchased)...... and how it tends to corrupt every official who
enters it by election or appointment. Was Judge Banner
corrupted (by someone with considerable money) who then blindly
ignored testimony of a credible counselor (hired by the
appointed attorney to the children by the court to insure
their rights) who
testified that sexual abuse was occurring by what she had
uncovered by outcries during the many sessions with the children
individually, and Shannon Coyle?
The federal prisoner who was also a
prosecution witness, gave very little relative testimony
concerning what his cell mate Red McCarver had told him
(while in the Red River County Jail together). His
statement to then Sheriff Terry Reed that "They had filed
the proper charges." was clearly an attempt to further
his own agenda.
This witness was probably
used by Varley in an attempt to "Muddy the Waters"
of the case in order to conceal the fact that he had
absolutely no evidence that any Aggravated Sexual Assault
had occurred. During deliberations the jury asked for
a specific section of his testimony that basically stated
that "They were doing drugs" (Shannon and Red) and they
(Mark and Rhonda) came into the room where they (Shannon and
Red) were, and she (Shannon) freaked out. There were
two hair follicle test done on Shannon Coyle, one before and
one shortly after the
alleged sexual assault against the defendants, and both of the tests came
back negative.
Prosecutor Varley also brought Shannon
Coyle's attorney Mr. Smith. Mark Lesher had helped her
locate this attorney to represent her in the Criminal Cases that were
brought against her in Red River County. Lesher was
prohibited by law from representing her in a case because he
had represented Jerry Coyle in a Civil case previously, so
he spent his own time with no pay to locate her an attorney
to represent her. (NO GOOD DEED EVER
GOES UNPUNISHED MARK!!) These
charges were fabricated by then Chief Deputy Larry Spangler,
whom we all know to be a perverted crook, and Jerry Coyle
(who by the outcries of his own wife and step children is a
pervert) in an
effort to help his friend Coyle keep Shannon in jail,
and cause her to miss the Child Custody hearings so that
Coyle would get custody of his 12 year old step-daughter.
Testimony was given by this witness on cross that Shannon
Coyle had out cried to him that Jerry Coyle was molesting
her daughter. She stated to him that she (Shannon)
came out of the shower with only a towel wrapped around her,
and entering the bedroom saw her daughter, dressed only in
panties and a t-shirt in bed with her head on Jerry's bare
stomach, with nothing but a sheet covering them.
Mr. Smith also testified that he wondered
by the attitude and actions of Shannon Coyle if she was on
drugs, and had her go and take the 5 panel drug test to see
if she was on drugs. The test came back NEGATIVE!
Let me remind you that this meeting
was after the alleged Aggravated Sexual assault.
Just a note, when
Mr. Smith started testifying to the out cries of Shannon to
him on the molestation of her daughter by Jerry Coyle,
Varley stopped the testimony and cried out in anger to the
Judge that he wanted to treat Mr. Smith as a hostile
witness. What a Criminal, Idiot, Fool Varley is
calling his own witness hostile for not answering as he
wished!!! I know about his past in this respect as when I
would not concoct amounts to his liking about the value of
the laptop computer in the Jimmie Townsend trial that he
blew up at me and told me that I was an asshole, and had his
goons, Perkins and Shimpock threaten me!!!
Another Prosecution witness, was a
pathological drug expert
from a laboratory in Texas. He would have been a
credible witness except for the fact that he was a forensic
pathologist with extensive experience in testing for drugs
in the body, and had done very little testing of hair
follicle drug tests.
He stated that the 2 drug test taken by Shannon Coyle would
not have been effective for Date Rape Drugs. This was
an attempt to discredit the two drug test taken by Shannon
because the prosecution wanted to make the jury believe that
is what she was given in the alleged incident.
Prosecutor Varley's only purpose for putting this man on the
stand was to discredit the 2, 5 panel drug tests taken by
Shannon Coyle showing that she had not been given or taken
any drugs before or after the alleged Aggravated Sexual
Assault allegation.
During the above testimony
Prosecutor Varley tried to muddy the water with accusations
that the pills Shannon Coyle said that she was allegedly given by Mark
Lesher were hand made using a pill press. There was
never any search warrant to search the Lesher Ranch, and no
evidence was ever found that any drug lab, or pill press of
any kind was proven to be anywhere in the possession of the
Lesher's. Probably the reason no search warrant was
ever drawn up or executed on the Lesher Ranch is that the
Criminal Idiots we have in the Justice System in this county
couldn't draw up a legal search warrant if someone gave them
a template. I have been friends with the Leshers for
about 3 years now, and have been all over the Ranch and it's
out buildings and property, and have never ever seen
anything that would indicate a lab or anything else that would
show a pill press to make any type of drugs. I have
never seen any type of drugs (except those prescribed by a
doctor) being used in any manner by the Leshers.
Testimony from a Child Protective Services
(CPS) worker from Oklahoma who investigated the home of
Shannon and Jerry Coyle in relation to the children, said
she found nothing and had questioned the children who said
that no abuse had occurred. She also stated that she
had made several telephone calls to individuals during her
investigation.
It seemed funny to
me, as it should you, that CPS had not even bothered to really do any real
investigation in an effort to protect these children from
being abused, by the outcries that had come out in the custody hearings,
and is still doing nothing to protect the children from
their outcries of sexual abuse by Jerry Coyle.
I guess that we are paying these people (CPS) for not doing
anything other than blindly filling out paperwork,
making phone calls, and doing absolutely no intensive
investigation into allegations of sexual child abuse.
Could it be that CPS has been influenced by someone with "A
lot of Money?" And, we
wonder why children are left in abusive situations while CPS
closes the case. Is this type of CPS
investigation only possible in Red River County, or does
this type of investigative malpractice go on by CPS across
the state of Texas, and Oklahoma? Another question.
Why did they use a CPS investigator from Oklahoma?
Texas has it's own state investigative office of CPS.
Does it not seem strange to you as the reader that Oklahoma
was used in Texas for an investigation? Shannon's
mother has stated that she attended a birthday party at the
Coyle residence, and that upon getting there walked in and
found Jerry Coyle watching an adult movie with the children
in the room, and that she took the children outside as soon
as she saw what was occurring. Shannon's father asked
Jerry what in hell are you thinking doing something like
this and Jerry Coyle stated that the kids are going to learn
about sex sooner or later.
|
